James Field

40 papers receiving 811 citations

Peers

James Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Spectroscopy 484
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 412
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 31
  • Fuel Technology 2
  • Cancer Research 18
Replace Subramaniam Sukumar with:
Subramaniam Sukumar United States
Ib Leunbach Sweden
K. R. Metz United States
Mor Mishkovsky Switzerland
James B. Aguayo United States
Qiuhong He United States
A.F. Mehlkopf Netherlands
Joel F Martin United States
Hyla Allouche‐Arnon Israel
Karl‐Heinz Spohn Germany
James Field relative to Subramaniam Sukumar United States Subramaniam Sukumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Subramaniam Sukumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Field Line = papers co-authored together James Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198190
2 198676
3 198671
4 198160
5 198655
6 199153
7 198343
8
Use of high-resolution 31P-labeled topical magnetic resonance spectroscopy to monitor in vivo tumor metabolism in rats.
198539
9 198628
10 198426
11 198724
12
Use of high resolution in vivo volume selected 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate leukemia in humans.
198722
13 198922
14 197321
15 198921
16 199018
17 198616
18 198715
19 198714
20 198413

About James Field

James Field is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Hematology, Geophysics and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (25 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (21 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1 paper), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (1 paper), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (1 paper), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (1 paper), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (1 paper) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (484 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (412 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (31 citations), Fuel Technology (2 citations) and Cancer Research (18 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David M. Doddrell, Michael G. Irving, William Miles Brooks, Ian M. Brereton, J.Mark Bulsing, M.Robin Bendall, David Thomas Pegg, Hiram Baddeley, Graham J. Galloway and ‪Stuart Crozier‬. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact