James Field
Impact in
- General Dentistry top 0.1%
- Dental Research and COVID-19
- Orthodontics top 5%
- Dental Erosion and Treatment
- Dental materials and restorations
Papers in
-
- Dental Education, Practice, Research 18
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 19
- Co-authors
- A. D. Walmsley (3 shared papers)J. G. Cowpe (2 shared papers)Matthew J. German (6 shared papers)Nicolás Martín (12 shared papers)Paula Waterhouse (5 shared papers)Jonathan Dixon (21 shared papers)María Cristina Manzanares‐Céspedes (10 shared papers)Julia R. Davies (14 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Journal Of Dental Education (32 papers)BDJ (7 papers)Journal of Dentistry (4 papers)Journal of Dental Education (3 papers)Archives of Oral Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenFrance
In The Last Decade
James Field
58 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- General Dentistry 430
- Orthodontics 131
- Periodontics 83
- Oral Surgery 85
- Family Practice 20
Countries citing papers authored by James Field
This map shows the geographic impact of James Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Field. The network helps show where James Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 164 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 156 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 93 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 13 |
About James Field
James Field is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Dentistry, Orthodontics and Periodontics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (19 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (18 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (17 papers), Dental Erosion and Treatment (6 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (5 papers), Dental materials and restorations (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers) and Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (430 citations), Orthodontics (131 citations), Periodontics (83 citations), Oral Surgery (85 citations) and Family Practice (20 citations). James Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and France. Frequent co-authors include A. D. Walmsley, J. G. Cowpe, Matthew J. German, Nicolás Martín, Paula Waterhouse, Jonathan Dixon, María Cristina Manzanares‐Céspedes, Julia R. Davies, Sibylle Vital and Corrado Paganelli. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal Of Dental Education, BDJ, Journal of Dentistry, Journal of Dental Education and Archives of Oral Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.