James Eyer

744 citations
9 papers · 81 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

James Eyer

8 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers

James Eyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Biophysics 12
  • Instrumentation 5
  • Media Technology 10
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 7
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 24
Replace F. Anstotz with:
F. Anstotz France
A. VanderLugt United States
Mark A. Massie United States
E. C. Hagerott United States
James G. Baker United States
Jean-Christophe Olaya Germany
V. Loriette France
F.T. Brady United States
Luis M. Gaspar Venancio Netherlands
Liangfu Guo China
James Eyer relative to F. Anstotz France F. Anstotz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
F. Anstotz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Eyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Eyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Eyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Eyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Eyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Eyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Eyer. The network helps show where James Eyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside James Eyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Eyer Line = papers co-authored together James Eyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 195727
2 196321
3 195817
4 19577
5 19604
6 19712
7 19542
8
PROBLEMS OF PHOTOGRAPHIC SPECTROPHOTOMETRY OF SHORT DURATION LIGHT PULSES: GRANULARITY, RECIPROCITY FAILURE, AND LATENT IMAGE STABILITY
19621
9 20250

About James Eyer

James Eyer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (1 paper), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (1 paper), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (1 paper), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (1 paper), Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper), Photonic and Optical Devices (1 paper) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (12 citations), Instrumentation (5 citations), Media Technology (10 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (7 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (24 citations). James Eyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include N. S. Kapany, Maurice Françon, Robert R. Shannon, A. B. Meinel, Robert E. Hopkins, Philip N. Slater, Urvi Desai, Hristelina Ilieva and Amanda Peltier. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Applied Spectroscopy, American Journal of Physics, Journal of the Optical Society of America and Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact