James Eaves

15 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

James Eaves
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Automotive Engineering 84
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 13
  • Aquatic Science 20
  • Finance 28
  • Plant Science 83
Replace David Ripplinger with:
David Ripplinger United States
E. Lorencowicz Poland
Umair Zahid Pakistan
Marcin Wysokiński Poland
Ana Fernández‐Ríos Spain
Frank Rosillo-Calle United Kingdom
Suwito Suwito Indonesia
Max Trommsdorff Germany
Ruslana Rachel Palatnik Israel
Md. Ataur Rahman Bangladesh
James Eaves relative to David Ripplinger United States David Ripplinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
David Ripplinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Eaves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Eaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Eaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Eaves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Eaves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Eaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Eaves. The network helps show where James Eaves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James Eaves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Eaves Line = papers co-authored together James Eaves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2004128
2 201781
3 200725
4 202023
5 201019
6 200711
7 200610
8 20088
9 20178
10
Neither Renewable Nor Reliable
20075
11 20072
12 20212
13 20231
14 20161
15 20071
16 20190
17
Fuel-Cell Vehicles: Solution or Shell Game?
20030
18 20090

About James Eaves

James Eaves is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Management Science and Operations Research and Accounting, having authored 18 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (3 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (3 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers), Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers) and Plant responses to elevated CO2 (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (84 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (13 citations), Aquatic Science (20 citations), Finance (28 citations) and Plant Science (83 citations). James Eaves has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey C. Williams, Margaret A. Franzen, Timothy J. Richards, S. E. Naranjo, Gabriel J. Power, Dmitry V. Vedenov, Calum G. Turvey, Chien‐Chi Chu, Valérie Fournier and Mark R. Manfredo. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Finance Review, Economic Modelling, Review of Financial Studies and Journal of Banking & Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact