Agricultural Finance Review

661 papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 661 papers published in Agricultural Finance Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Agricultural Finance Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (431 papers), Soil Science (295 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (266 papers) specifically the topics of Agricultural risk and resilience (229 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (201 papers) and Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Agricultural Finance Review are Calum G. Turvey, Ashok K. Mishra, Oliver Mußhoff, Ani L. Katchova, Abdul-Hanan Abdallah, Jerry R. Skees, Mamudu Abunga Akudugu, Joshua D. Woodard, Allen M. Featherstone and Martin Odening.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Agricultural Finance Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Agricultural Finance Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Agricultural Finance Review.

Countries where authors publish in Agricultural Finance Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Agricultural Finance Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Agricultural Finance Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agricultural Finance Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025