James E. Tate

17 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

James E. Tate
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cancer Research 132
  • Otorhinolaryngology 37
  • Epidemiology 236
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 153
  • Immunology 152
Replace Katrina L. Salazar with:
Katrina L. Salazar United States
Katsumi Tsukazaki Japan
Wagner V. Yotov Canada
Tomohiko Ishibashi Japan
Charlotte Y. Dai United States
W Biczysko Poland
Weiming Zhao China
Cydney Urbanek United States
Thomas Papadopoulos Germany
Deke Jiang China
James E. Tate relative to Katrina L. Salazar United States Katrina L. Salazar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Katrina L. Salazar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Tate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Tate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Tate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Tate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Tate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Tate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Tate. The network helps show where James E. Tate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Tate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Tate Line = papers co-authored together James E. Tate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1990172
2 1992149
3 1990104
4 199769
5 199666
6 199654
7 198952
8
Prevalence of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in benign and malignant tumors of the upper respiratory tract.
199647
9 199040
10
Monoclonal origin of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and some vulvar hyperplasias.
199738
11
Human papillomavirus type 18 and intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
199429
12 199625
13 199723
14 199417
15 199014
16 19978
17
Pseudobowenoid change of the vulva: a histologic variant of untreated condylata acuminatum.
19968

About James E. Tate

James E. Tate is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Genital Health and Disease (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (2 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper) and Entomological Studies and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (132 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (37 citations), Epidemiology (236 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (153 citations) and Immunology (152 citations). James E. Tate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Ron, Allan R. Brasier, Joel F. Habener, Christopher P. Crum, Zaid Abassi, Eliahu Golomb, H R Keiser, George L. Mutter, C. Meg McLachlin and Ellen E. Sheets. Their work appears in journals such as Human Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Molecular Endocrinology, Gynecologic Oncology and The EMBO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact