James E. Stine

1.8k citations
89 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Stine

81 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

James E. Stine
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Hardware and Architecture 540
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 518
  • Signal Processing 258
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 922
  • Computer Networks and Communications 202
Replace Tomás Lang with:
Tomás Lang United States
Bogdan Pasca France
Arnaud Tisserand France
David Lewis Canada
José Monteiro Portugal
Gerald E. Sobelman United States
Miloš Krstić Germany
Michael Schulte United States
Akhilesh Tyagi United States
Behrooz Parhami United States
James E. Stine relative to Tomás Lang United States Tomás Lang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Tomás Lang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Stine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Stine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Stine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Stine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Stine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Stine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Stine. The network helps show where James E. Stine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Stine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Stine Line = papers co-authored together James E. Stine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007322
2 1999120
3 2016113
4 199986
5 199959
6 200254
7 200344
8 200637
9 200531
10 200428
11 200126
12 200822
13 201722
14 200420
15 200216
16 200915
17 200515
18 201615
19 201414
20 200213

About James E. Stine

James E. Stine is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Biomedical Engineering and Signal Processing, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Low-power high-performance VLSI design (58 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (46 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (27 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (17 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (16 papers), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (15 papers), VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing (13 papers) and Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (540 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (518 citations), Signal Processing (258 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (922 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (202 citations). James E. Stine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Michael Schulte, Michael Schulte, Ivan D. Castellanos, W. Rhett Davis, Michael Bucher, Paul D. Franzon, Julie Oh, Ravi Jenkal, Fred Love and Michael Wood. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Computers, Numerical Algorithms, Electronics, Journal of Signal Processing Systems and IEEE Embedded Systems Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact