James E. Robbers

1.2k citations
30 papers · 929 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Robbers

29 papers receiving 743 citations

Peers

James E. Robbers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pharmacology 118
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 265
  • Pharmacology 175
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 75
  • Plant Science 315
Replace Yoshinori Shiobara with:
Yoshinori Shiobara Japan
G.B.Marini Bettolò Italy
Yogendra N. Shukla India
Jerôme D. Msonthi Malawi
Toshikazu Sekine Japan
Hildebert Wagner Germany
J. D. Connolly United Kingdom
J.L. Beal United States
C. Galeffi Italy
Christa Werner Switzerland
James E. Robbers relative to Yoshinori Shiobara Japan Yoshinori Shiobara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Yoshinori Shiobara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Robbers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Robbers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Robbers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Robbers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Robbers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Robbers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Robbers. The network helps show where James E. Robbers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James E. Robbers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Robbers Line = papers co-authored together James E. Robbers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Pharmacognosy and Pharmacobiotechnology
1996232
2 197379
3 197676
4 197263
5 198052
6 201047
7 196942
8 197439
9 196637
10 197829
11
Pharmacognosy 9th edition
198829
12 199927
13 197023
14 196820
15 196920
16
Tyler's Herbs of Choice
200219
17 198018
18 198715
19 198313
20 197312

About James E. Robbers

James E. Robbers is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 929 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and fungal interactions (19 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (5 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (118 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (265 citations), Pharmacology (175 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (75 citations) and Plant Science (315 citations). James E. Robbers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Heinz G. Floss, Varro E. Tyler, Marilyn K. Speedie, John M. Cassady, Larry W. Robertson, Peter Heinstein, A Jíndra, Hideaki Otsuka, Eddy Arnold and Jon Clardy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact