James E. Melzer

479 citations
42 papers · 394 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Melzer

38 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

James E. Melzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Human-Computer Interaction 55
  • Spectroscopy 93
  • Media Technology 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 125
  • Analytical Chemistry 35
Replace Masaomi Oda with:
Masaomi Oda Japan
Richard C. Bergman United States
C. van Trigt Netherlands
Tetsuo Iwata Japan
Ulf P. Gustafsson Sweden
Joaquín Campos Acosta Spain
Alain D. Maruani France
Liviu Ivănescu Canada
Elsevier Sdol
Géraldine Faure France
James E. Melzer relative to Masaomi Oda Japan Masaomi Oda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
Masaomi Oda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Melzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Melzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Melzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Melzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Melzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Melzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Melzer. The network helps show where James E. Melzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James E. Melzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Melzer Line = papers co-authored together James E. Melzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198093
2 197924
3 200023
4 198019
5 200618
6 199717
7 197817
8 197615
9 199115
10 201214
11 199813
12 199912
13 198911
14 197911
15 198010
16
Homonuclear diatomic molecules
19769
17 19917
18 20096
19
Spectroscopic constants for selected homonuclear diatomic molecules. Volume I. A through I. Interim report
19766
20 20155

About James E. Melzer

James E. Melzer is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Media Technology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (10 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (4 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (3 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (55 citations), Spectroscopy (93 citations), Media Technology (49 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (125 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (35 citations). James E. Melzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. F. Bott, R. F. Heidner, D. G. Sutton, Steven N. Suchard, Gene A. Capelle, Andreas Weber⋆, G. Jentzsch, Thomas Jahr, Alfred O. Effenberg and Arno Zinke. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Applied Spectroscopy, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Optical Engineering and Tectonophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact