This map shows the geographic impact of Elsevier Sdol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elsevier Sdol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elsevier Sdol more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elsevier Sdol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elsevier Sdol. The network helps show where Elsevier Sdol may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
7 of 7 papers shown
#
Work
1
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Elsevier Sdol is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 7 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (1 paper), Nuclear physics research studies (1 paper), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (1 paper), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Augmented Reality Applications (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (74 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (38 citations), Structural Biology (3 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (43 citations) and Ophthalmology (16 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.