James E. Kruger

877 citations
15 papers · 748 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Kruger

15 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers

James E. Kruger
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 305
  • Biotechnology 107
  • Food Science 177
  • Plant Science 259
  • Gastroenterology 19
Replace Wayne C. Thresher with:
Wayne C. Thresher United States
Christopher H. S. Hitchcock United Kingdom
Gabriella Saviano Italy
Yasuo Ariyoshi Japan
Henrik Østdal Denmark
James C. Zahnley United States
Gy. Hajós Hungary
A. C. Wagenknecht United States
Earl D. Mitchell United States
Javier Velasco Spain
James E. Kruger relative to Wayne C. Thresher United States Wayne C. Thresher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Wayne C. Thresher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Kruger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Kruger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Kruger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Kruger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Kruger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Kruger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Kruger. The network helps show where James E. Kruger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside James E. Kruger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Kruger Line = papers co-authored together James E. Kruger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Pasta and Noodle Technology
1996255
2 1969191
3
Enzymes and their role in cereal technology
1987130
4 197648
5
Enzymes and color.
198833
6 197922
7 197616
8 197716
9
High Performance Liquid Chromatography of Cereal and Legume Proteins
199413
10 19676
11 19656
12 19664
13 19654
14 19813
15
[Sensitivity of fructose diphosphate binding sites of yeast pyruvate kinase to pyruvate kinase antibodies].
19681

About James E. Kruger

James E. Kruger is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Organic Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytase and its Applications (5 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers), Food composition and properties (2 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper), Dye analysis and toxicity (1 paper) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (305 citations), Biotechnology (107 citations), Food Science (177 citations), Plant Science (259 citations) and Gastroenterology (19 citations). James E. Kruger has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arnold Boiteux, B. Hess, K.R. Preston, Clyde E. Stauffer, David R. Lineback, G. B. Reed, Y. Pomeranz, J. A. Bietz, C.C. Lee and L. J. LaCroix. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Phytochemistry, Tetrahedron and Canadian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact