James E. Keller

1.5k citations
42 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Keller

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James E. Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Neurology 667
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 450
  • Insect Science 170
  • Sensory Systems 52
  • Endocrinology 41
Replace William J. Wolfgang with:
William J. Wolfgang United States
Beth Gordesky-Gold United States
Margaret S. Ho China
Heidrun Kern Germany
Martin J. Gallagher United States
S. R. Dlouhy United States
Ivo Lebrun Brazil
H.A. Baylis United Kingdom
J. L. Sherwood United States
Márcia Renata Mortari Brazil
James E. Keller relative to William J. Wolfgang United States William J. Wolfgang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
William J. Wolfgang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Keller. The network helps show where James E. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Keller Line = papers co-authored together James E. Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999161
2 2003152
3 200199
4 200178
5 200673
6 202060
7 198757
8 198951
9 200450
10 200235
11 201735
12 198935
13 200834
14 198727
15 198824
16 199223
17 199922
18 195517
19 201117
20 201116

About James E. Keller

James E. Keller is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (14 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (11 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (9 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (667 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (450 citations), Insect Science (170 citations), Sensory Systems (52 citations) and Endocrinology (41 citations). James E. Keller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Elaine A. Neale, James R. Miller, Michael Adler, Fang Cai, George A. Oyler, Sharad S. Deshpande, Robert E. Sheridan, J. L. Spencer, Muraleedharan G. Nair and Rod M. Heisey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of Insect Behavior, Biochemistry, FEBS Letters and Infection and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact