James E. Erman

120 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

James E. Erman
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Cell Biology 1.2k
  • Electrochemistry 436
  • Biophysics 319
  • Molecular Biology 2.4k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 458
Replace David B. Goodin with:
David B. Goodin United States
Bob F. VAN GELDER Netherlands
Roland Aasa Sweden
Francis Millett United States
Abel Schejter Israel
L. Powers United States
Gianantonio Battistuzzi Italy
Lars‐Erik Andréasson Sweden
Carlos Gómez‐Moreno Spain
Ninian J. Blackburn United States
James E. Erman relative to David B. Goodin United States David B. Goodin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David B. Goodin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Erman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Erman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Erman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Erman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Erman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Erman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Erman. The network helps show where James E. Erman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Erman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Erman Line = papers co-authored together James E. Erman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1972325
2 1971185
3 1993153
4 1989143
5 1993107
6 199499
7 197598
8 200291
9 198087
10 197878
11 199277
12 197474
13 196654
14 199054
15 198254
16 197553
17 198750
18 199150
19 199249
20 197449

About James E. Erman

James E. Erman is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 121 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (73 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (43 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (40 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (18 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (13 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (11 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.2k citations), Electrochemistry (436 citations), Biophysics (319 citations), Molecular Biology (2.4k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (458 citations). James E. Erman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Lidia B. Vitello, James D. Satterlee, Takashi Yonetani, Joseph Kraut, J. Matthew Mauro, George H. Reed, J. Scott Leigh, Hirokazu Yamamoto, Andrew F.W. Coulson and Gordon G. Hammes. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact