James E. Chastain

17 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

James E. Chastain
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 135
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 92
  • Pharmaceutical Science 23
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace Lisa Cheeks with:
Lisa Cheeks United States
Teresia A. Carreon United States
Maria D. Donovan Ireland
Kathleen Fillacier France
Tadahiro Murakami Japan
A. A. Voskresenskaya Russia
Sonja Krösser United States
Fred Feldman United States
Jess T. Whitson United States
Nan Yan China
James E. Chastain relative to Lisa Cheeks United States Lisa Cheeks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Lisa Cheeks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Chastain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Chastain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Chastain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Chastain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Chastain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Chastain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Chastain. The network helps show where James E. Chastain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Chastain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Chastain Line = papers co-authored together James E. Chastain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201264
2 201536
3 200533
4 202031
5 199622
6 198715
7 201014
8 201514
9 201814
10 202213
11
Intraocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of brolucizumab (RTH258) in nonhuman primates
201613
12 19859
13 19819
14 20237
15 19907
16 19896
17
In-vitro and In-vivo pharmacology of SAF312 as a TRPV1 inhibitor for ocular surface pain
20212

About James E. Chastain

James E. Chastain is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pharmacology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (135 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (92 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (23 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). James E. Chastain has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Uday B. Kompella, Chandrasekar Durairaj, Thomas L. Pazdernik, Michael A. Curtis, David C. Dahlin, Mark Sanders, Patricia Heacock, Elaine Souder, Nagendra Chemuturi and Martha E. Gadd. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Vision Science & Technology, Experimental Eye Research, Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact