James E. Casanova

764 citations
8 papers · 673 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Casanova

8 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

James E. Casanova
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cell Biology 237
  • Immunology and Allergy 37
  • Physiology 127
  • Molecular Biology 346
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Anne Gut with:
Anne Gut Switzerland
Phil Marsh United Kingdom
Riley Tucker United States
Tina Griffin United States
Henriette Burlet France
Atul Kumar Goyal India
Sandra Harris‐Hooker United States
Masanaga Yamawaki Japan
William D. Ball United States
F. Bierring Denmark
James E. Casanova relative to Anne Gut Switzerland Anne Gut's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Anne Gut · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Casanova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Casanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Casanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Casanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Casanova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Casanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Casanova. The network helps show where James E. Casanova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside James E. Casanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Casanova Line = papers co-authored together James E. Casanova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1991269
2 1990243
3 200771
4 199144
5 198937
6 19925
7
Medical staffs and nursing staffs: the need for joint leadership.
20093
8
The docs are in charge. Physician executives branch out to lead a diverse array of institutions.
20031

About James E. Casanova

James E. Casanova is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Galectins and Cancer Biology (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Asthma and respiratory diseases (1 paper) and Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (237 citations), Immunology and Allergy (37 citations), Physiology (127 citations), Molecular Biology (346 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). James E. Casanova has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Keith E. Mostov, Gerard Apodaca, Philip P. Breitfeld, Stuart A. Ross, Mark Young, Bryan Hendricks and Jack Kaufman. Their work appears in journals such as JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Science, CHEST Journal and Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact