James E. Carter

71 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

James E. Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Reproductive Medicine 225
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 172
  • Pharmaceutical Science 106
  • Cancer Research 204
  • Oncology 341
Replace John E. Ray with:
John E. Ray Australia
Xun� Li China
Philippe Bourget France
John D. McConnell United States
Li‐Jiuan Shen Taiwan
Daniel Couturier France
William J. Johnson United States
Xin Wang China
Alan T. Remaley United States
Mitsuru Murata Japan
James E. Carter relative to John E. Ray Australia John E. Ray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
John E. Ray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Carter. The network helps show where James E. Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Carter Line = papers co-authored together James E. Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994136
2 2014105
3 201596
4 199292
5 199275
6 201568
7 199068
8 201567
9 201662
10 201458
11 201750
12 198050
13 199046
14 201746
15 201544
16 198744
17 199443
18 201740
19 199439
20 201737

About James E. Carter

James E. Carter is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (5 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers) and Hernia repair and management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (225 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (172 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (106 citations), Cancer Research (204 citations) and Oncology (341 citations). James E. Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Seema Singh, Ajay P. Singh, Nikhil Tyagi, Arun Bhardwaj, Sanjeev K. Srivastava, Sachin Kumar Deshmukh, Nevio Cimolai, Steven McClellan, Brenda J. Morrison and Sumit Arora. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Oncotarget, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cancer Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact