James Drew
Impact in
-
- Cellular transport and secretion
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors 1
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 1
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
- Surgery 2
- Co-authors
- Guillermo López‐Doménech (3 shared papers)Josef T. Kittler (5 shared papers)Laura M. Machesky (3 shared papers)Elizabeth C. Davenport (2 shared papers)Nathalie Higgs (1 shared paper)Sharon A. Tooze (1 shared paper)Davor Ivankovic (1 shared paper)Flavie Lesept (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cell Reports (1 paper)Autophagy (1 paper)Disease Models & Mechanisms (1 paper)Biofabrication (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Drew
8 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cell Biology 61
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
- Hepatology 18
- Molecular Biology 147
- Developmental Neuroscience 7
Countries citing papers authored by James Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of James Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Drew. The network helps show where James Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 0 |
About James Drew
James Drew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cell Biology, Hepatology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (61 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (54 citations), Hepatology (18 citations), Molecular Biology (147 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (7 citations). James Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Guillermo López‐Doménech, Josef T. Kittler, Laura M. Machesky, Elizabeth C. Davenport, Nathalie Higgs, Sharon A. Tooze, Davor Ivankovic, Flavie Lesept, Ian J. White and Christian Covill‐Cooke. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Reports, Autophagy, Disease Models & Mechanisms, Biofabrication and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.