James Deane
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 6
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 5
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 4
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 3
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
-
- Connexins and lens biology 3
- Co-authors
- A R Rosenthal (4 shared papers)John R. Thompson (3 shared papers)Anthony B. Hall (3 shared papers)Bharat Kapoor (2 shared papers)Vasileios Konidaris (2 shared papers)Konstantinos T. Tsaousis (2 shared papers)David H. Johnson (1 shared paper)Dale L. Shaner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ophthalmic Epidemiology (3 papers)Eye (2 papers)Weed Science (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
James Deane
15 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Ophthalmology 172
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 72
- Pollution 28
- Neurology 15
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 24
Countries citing papers authored by James Deane
This map shows the geographic impact of James Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Deane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Deane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Deane. The network helps show where James Deane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Deane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 |
About James Deane
James Deane is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rheumatology and Surgery, having authored 16 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (5 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (172 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (72 citations), Pollution (28 citations), Neurology (15 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (24 citations). James Deane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include A R Rosenthal, John R. Thompson, Anthony B. Hall, Bharat Kapoor, Vasileios Konidaris, Konstantinos T. Tsaousis, David H. Johnson, Dale L. Shaner, Chandra M. Kumar and K.‐L. Kong. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Eye, Weed Science, Scientific Reports and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.