James Deane
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Papers in
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 3
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 2
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
-
- Connexins and lens biology 2
- Co-authors
- A R Rosenthal (4 shared papers)John R. Thompson (3 shared papers)Anthony B. Hall (3 shared papers)Vasileios Konidaris (2 shared papers)Bharat Kapoor (2 shared papers)Konstantinos T. Tsaousis (2 shared papers)David H. Johnson (1 shared paper)Dale L. Shaner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ophthalmic Epidemiology (3 papers)Eye (2 papers)Ocular Immunology and Inflammation (1 paper)Weed Science (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
James Deane
15 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Ophthalmology 136
- Pollution 28
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 33
- Neurology 12
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 21
Countries citing papers authored by James Deane
This map shows the geographic impact of James Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Deane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Deane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Deane. The network helps show where James Deane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Deane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 |
About James Deane
James Deane is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (1 paper), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (136 citations), Pollution (28 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (33 citations), Neurology (12 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (21 citations). James Deane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include A R Rosenthal, John R. Thompson, Anthony B. Hall, Vasileios Konidaris, Bharat Kapoor, Konstantinos T. Tsaousis, David H. Johnson, Dale L. Shaner, Stephen T. Turner and P Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Eye, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation, Weed Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.