Daniel Byles
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Ocular Infections and Treatments
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 5
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 2
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 1
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Peggy Frith (2 shared papers)John F. Salmon (2 shared papers)Michael Smith (4 shared papers)Miles Stanford (1 shared paper)E M Graham (1 shared paper)Rubina Rahman (1 shared paper)Robert J. Casson (1 shared paper)Peter J. Chapman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Eye (3 papers)Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (2 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (2 papers)Canadian Medical Association Journal (1 paper)Retina (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Daniel Byles
12 papers receiving 247 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Ophthalmology 215
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 40
- Neurology 13
- Epidemiology 28
- Pharmacology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Byles
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Byles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Byles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Byles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Byles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Byles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Byles. The network helps show where Daniel Byles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Byles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 60 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 0 |
About Daniel Byles
Daniel Byles is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Surgery and Hepatology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers), Liver Diseases and Immunity (1 paper), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (1 paper), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (215 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (40 citations), Neurology (13 citations), Epidemiology (28 citations) and Pharmacology (14 citations). Daniel Byles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Peggy Frith, John F. Salmon, Michael Smith, Miles Stanford, E M Graham, Rubina Rahman, Robert J. Casson, Peter J. Chapman, P H Constable and Siying Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Canadian Medical Association Journal and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.