Daniel Byles
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 7
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 6
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 2
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 3
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Peggy Frith (2 shared papers)John F. Salmon (2 shared papers)Michael Smith (4 shared papers)Miles Stanford (1 shared paper)E M Graham (1 shared paper)Robert J. Casson (1 shared paper)Rubina Rahman (1 shared paper)Peter J. Chapman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Eye (3 papers)Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (2 papers)Current Opinion in Ophthalmology (2 papers)Canadian Medical Association Journal (1 paper)Ophthalmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Daniel Byles
12 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Ophthalmology 229
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 96
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 31
- Neurology 9
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 30
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Byles
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Byles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Byles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Byles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Byles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Byles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Byles. The network helps show where Daniel Byles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Byles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 0 |
About Daniel Byles
Daniel Byles is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (229 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (96 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (31 citations), Neurology (9 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (30 citations). Daniel Byles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Peggy Frith, John F. Salmon, Michael Smith, Miles Stanford, E M Graham, Robert J. Casson, Rubina Rahman, Peter J. Chapman, Siying Lin and P H Constable. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Canadian Medical Association Journal and Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.