James D. Acton

987 citations
22 papers · 622 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James D. Acton

22 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers

James D. Acton
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 519
  • Speech and Hearing 73
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Molecular Medicine 25
  • Clinical Psychology 66
Replace Ad F. Nagelkerke with:
Ad F. Nagelkerke Netherlands
Linda Pedder Canada
Susan Madge United Kingdom
Clare Saunders United Kingdom
Yusuf Aydemir Türkiye
Andrew Tai Australia
Leah Hickey Australia
James Goldring United Kingdom
Tiemo-Joerg Bandel United States
Vered Nir Israel
James D. Acton relative to Ad F. Nagelkerke Netherlands Ad F. Nagelkerke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ad F. Nagelkerke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Acton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Acton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Acton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Acton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Acton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Acton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Acton. The network helps show where James D. Acton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James D. Acton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James D. Acton Line = papers co-authored together James D. Acton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201085
2 200778
3 201077
4 200856
5 200944
6 200544
7 200641
8 201034
9 200730
10 201027
11 201424
12 200124
13 201319
14 200511
15 201810
16 20066
17 20103
18 19993
19 20072
20 20092

About James D. Acton

James D. Acton is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Speech and Hearing, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (18 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (7 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (2 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (519 citations), Speech and Hearing (73 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations), Molecular Medicine (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (66 citations). James D. Acton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Raouf Amin, Kimberly A. Driscoll, Avani C. Modi, Gary L. McPhail, R. Paul Boesch, Matthew Fenchel, Michael Seid, Claire Langston, Robert W. Wilmott and Thomas H. Inge. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Pulmonology, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, CHEST Journal, The Journal of Pediatrics and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact