James Corner

14 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

James Corner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Information Systems and Management 228
  • Management Information Systems 141
  • Marketing 134
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
  • Strategy and Management 154
Replace Sena Ozdemir with:
Sena Ozdemir United Kingdom
Peijian Song China
Xiaodie Pu China
Michael Newby United States
Ling-Lang Tang Taiwan
Chung‐Shing Lee United States
Hamid Reza Khedmatgozar Iran
Tom E. Yoon United States
Edward Hartono United States
Umme Hani Australia
James Corner relative to Sena Ozdemir United Kingdom Sena Ozdemir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Sena Ozdemir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Corner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Corner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Corner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Corner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Corner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Corner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Corner. The network helps show where James Corner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside James Corner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Corner Line = papers co-authored together James Corner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2005212
2 200998
3 201687
4 199746
5 201128
6 200322
7 201112
8 200811
9 20108
10 20065
11
The application of the Quick Scan Audit methodology in SME's
20073
12
The development of a generic supply chain integration model using the Quick Scan Diagnostic Methodology
20071
13 20081
14 20111

About James Corner

James Corner is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Marketing, having authored 14 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Quality and Supply Management (4 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers), Quality and Management Systems (2 papers), Product Development and Customization (2 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (228 citations), Management Information Systems (141 citations), Marketing (134 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (120 citations) and Strategy and Management (154 citations). James Corner has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, France and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Stuart M. Dillon, Bill Doolin, Thi Thanh Huong (Jenny) TRAN, Robert John McQueen, Nereu F. Kock, Donald L. Keefer, Craig W. Kirkwood, Rachel Jones, Paul Childerhouse and Eric Deakins. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Journal of Global Information Management, The Learning Organization, Systems Research and Behavioral Science and Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact