James Coplan

862 citations
28 papers · 585 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

James Coplan

27 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

James Coplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Sensory Systems 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Clinical Psychology 161
  • Otorhinolaryngology 30
Replace Ivette Cruz with:
Ivette Cruz United States
Jennifer L. Dunbar United States
Ivette Cejas United States
Mary Haslum United Kingdom
Maria Cecília Marconi Pinheiro Lima Brazil
Amisha Kanji South Africa
Lynne E. Rowan United States
Frances Stevens United States
Bellur Rajashekhar India
Gregory L. Lof United States
James Coplan relative to Ivette Cruz United States Ivette Cruz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ivette Cruz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Coplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Coplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Coplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Coplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Coplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Coplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Coplan. The network helps show where James Coplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James Coplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Coplan Line = papers co-authored together James Coplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198885
2 198763
3 198261
4 199833
5 200532
6 199030
7 199529
8 198228
9 198727
10 200323
11 198522
12 199519
13 199518
14 198118
15 200015
16 200313
17
Isochromosome 9q in an infant exposed to ethanol prenatally.
198513
18 199311
19 20019
20 19959

About James Coplan

James Coplan is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language Development and Disorders (8 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (84 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (161 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (30 citations). James Coplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Gleason, Margaret L. Williams, Abbas F. Jawad, Rita M. Ryan, Michael Burke, Lawrence J. Lewandowski, Diane B. D'Eugenio, Leonard B. Weiner, Timothy Dye and Robert A. Richman. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, The Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact