James Cleak
Impact in
Papers in
- Genetics 8
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 3
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 2
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 3
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Flint (7 shared papers)Xiangchao Gan (3 shared papers)Richard Mott (4 shared papers)Guo‐Jen Huang (3 shared papers)David A. Keays (2 shared papers)Martin Goodson (2 shared papers)Binnaz Yalcin (3 shared papers)Jérôme Nicod (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature (3 papers)Nature Communications (3 papers)Cell (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
James Cleak
19 papers receiving 3.4k citations
James Cleak's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Genetics 1.2k
- Aging 75
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Developmental Neuroscience 97
- Cell Biology 315
Countries citing papers authored by James Cleak
This map shows the geographic impact of James Cleak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Cleak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Cleak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Cleak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Cleak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Cleak. The network helps show where James Cleak may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Cleak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 1189 |
| 2 | High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 899 |
| 3 | 2007 | 382 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 250 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 194 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 109 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 78 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 77 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 |
About James Cleak
James Cleak is a scholar working on Genetics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.2k citations), Aging (75 citations), Molecular Biology (2.0k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (97 citations) and Cell Biology (315 citations). James Cleak has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Flint, Xiangchao Gan, Richard Mott, Guo‐Jen Huang, David A. Keays, Martin Goodson, Binnaz Yalcin, Jérôme Nicod, Peter L. Oliver and David J. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications, Cell, Scientific Reports and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.