James Case

911 citations
21 papers · 617 · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Health top 2%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
    • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Papers in

James Case

20 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

James Case
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Health 359
  • General Health Professions 257
  • Gender Studies 82
  • Clinical Psychology 178
  • Social Psychology 154
Replace Michael R. Duke with:
Michael R. Duke United States
Amber Clough United States
Veronica P. S. Njie-Carr United States
Deborah Fish Ragin United States
Karen Austrian Kenya
Eileen Mazur Abel United States
Eusebius Small United States
Christopher B. Stults United States
Erin Pearson United States
Allison C. Morrill United States
James Case relative to Michael R. Duke United States Michael R. Duke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Michael R. Duke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Case. The network helps show where James Case may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Case, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Case Line = papers co-authored together James Case links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201789
2 201554
3 202050
4 202149
5 201743
6 201838
7 201537
8 202035
9 202030
10 201427
11 202326
12 201825
13 201622
14 200820
15 202119
16 201418
17 201514
18 202112
19 20228
20 20021

About James Case

James Case is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (11 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (8 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (3 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (359 citations), General Health Professions (257 citations), Gender Studies (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (178 citations) and Social Psychology (154 citations). James Case has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Democratic Republic of the Congo. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Glass, Nancy Perrin, Ginger C. Hanson, Amber Clough, Karen Eden, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Andrea C. Gielen, Jill T. Messing, Tina Bloom and Kelly Scott‐Storey. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, BMJ Global Health, Nursing Research and Contemporary Clinical Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact