James C. Wright

145 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

James C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Equine 198
  • Small Animals 411
  • Parasitology 264
  • Endocrinology 166
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 337
Replace Robert Klopfleisch with:
Robert Klopfleisch Germany
Steven Krakowka United States
Stanley L. Marks United States
Fábio Del Piero United States
Willem van Eden Netherlands
Ralf S. Mueller Germany
Albert E. Jergens United States
Harm HogenEsch United States
Subash Sad Canada
Timothy R. Mosmann Canada
James C. Wright relative to Robert Klopfleisch Germany Robert Klopfleisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Robert Klopfleisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Wright. The network helps show where James C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Wright Line = papers co-authored together James C. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 145 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964152
2 2001138
3 2011102
4 1965101
5 2003100
6 200497
7 200296
8 199596
9 201293
10 200091
11 200488
12 198978
13
Prevalence of canine parasites based on fecal flotation
199678
14 201071
15 196571
16 200169
17 202063
18 199162
19 201761
20 200360

About James C. Wright

James C. Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Small Animals, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, having authored 145 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (10 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (9 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (9 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (9 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers) and Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (198 citations), Small Animals (411 citations), Parasitology (264 citations), Endocrinology (166 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (337 citations). James C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jyoti S. Choudhary, Mark W. Bohling, Milton R. Hejtmancik, Steven A. Kincaid, Ralph A. Henderson, D.A. Stringfellow, Brian C. Gilger, Frank L. Jennings, Robert A. Quint and Michele Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Theriogenology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Surgery and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact