James C. Wright

147 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

James C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Equine 206
  • Small Animals 424
  • Parasitology 281
  • Endocrinology 178
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 349
Replace D. F. Kelly with:
D. F. Kelly United Kingdom
Stanley L. Marks United States
Steven G. Krakowka United States
Giselle L. Hosgood United States
Willem van Eden Netherlands
Per Brandtzæg Norway
Ralf S. Mueller Germany
Albert E. Jergens United States
Jane E. Sykes United States
Timothy R. Mosmann Canada
James C. Wright relative to D. F. Kelly United Kingdom D. F. Kelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
D. F. Kelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Wright. The network helps show where James C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Wright Line = papers co-authored together James C. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964177
2 2001151
3 1965113
4 2003100
5 2002100
6 2004100
7 199596
8 200495
9 200095
10 201291
11 198989
12
Prevalence of canine parasites based on fecal flotation
199681
13 196579
14 200179
15 201071
16 202065
17 199165
18 200365
19 201763
20 199162

About James C. Wright

James C. Wright is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science, Equine, Infectious Diseases and Parasitology, having authored 147 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (10 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (9 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (9 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (9 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (6 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers) and Veterinary Oncology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (206 citations), Small Animals (424 citations), Parasitology (281 citations), Endocrinology (178 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (349 citations). James C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Mark W. Bohling, Milton R. Hejtmancik, J. Choudhary, Steven A. Kincaid, Ralph A. Henderson, Michele Cohen, Brian C. Gilger, Robert A. Quint, Frank L. Jennings and R. David Whitley. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Theriogenology, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Surgery and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact