James C. Hebert

59 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

James C. Hebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 44
  • Emergency Medicine 79
  • Infectious Diseases 169
  • Surgery 361
  • Epidemiology 270
Replace Ben Morton with:
Ben Morton United Kingdom
Margot R. Krauss United States
Angela Myers United States
Vyta Senikas Canada
Olivier Irion Switzerland
George M. Johnson United States
A Lafuma France
Zuber D. Mulla United States
Anne M. Butler United States
J. M. M. van Lith Netherlands
James C. Hebert relative to Ben Morton United Kingdom Ben Morton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Ben Morton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Hebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Hebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Hebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Hebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Hebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Hebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Hebert. The network helps show where James C. Hebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Hebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Hebert Line = papers co-authored together James C. Hebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001228
2 201191
3 199279
4 199076
5 200961
6
Preparation and release characteristics of tobramycin-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads.
198658
7 200845
8 199944
9 201238
10 198537
11 198732
12 198532
13 200231
14 200028
15 199324
16 199224
17 198624
18 201521
19 198319
20 199618

About James C. Hebert

James C. Hebert is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Immunology, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Response and Inflammation (8 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (8 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (4 papers), Amoebic Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Microscopic Colitis (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers) and Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (44 citations), Emergency Medicine (79 citations), Infectious Diseases (169 citations), Surgery (361 citations) and Epidemiology (270 citations). James C. Hebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Musher, Silvia Attorri, Sherry Dunbar, Richard L. Gamelli, John H. Davis, James G. Howe, Robert Fraser, Michael O’Reilly, Fong Chan and Kurt Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Research, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Annals of Surgery and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact