James B. Appel

1.9k citations
77 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

James B. Appel

75 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James B. Appel
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 985
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 367
  • Clinical Psychology 371
  • Toxicology 53
  • Small Animals 108
Replace J. B. Appel with:
J. B. Appel United States
Peter L. Carlton United States
Tomoji Yanagita Japan
Richard H. Rech United States
Sheldon B. Sparber United States
W. H. Morse United States
I. Munkvad Denmark
W. Marvin Davis United States
S.R. Goldberg United States
M.H. SEEVERS United States
James B. Appel relative to J. B. Appel United States J. B. Appel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
J. B. Appel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James B. Appel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James B. Appel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B. Appel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B. Appel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James B. Appel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B. Appel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B. Appel. The network helps show where James B. Appel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James B. Appel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James B. Appel Line = papers co-authored together James B. Appel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198991
2 196377
3 198160
4 198760
5 198256
6 198255
7 197050
8 197642
9 198342
10 197340
11 198639
12 199938
13 196236
14 198535
15 197934
16 198233
17 197830
18 196129
19 198929
20 198325

About James B. Appel

James B. Appel is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (46 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (25 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (17 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (9 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (985 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (367 citations), Clinical Psychology (371 citations), Toxicology (53 citations) and Small Animals (108 citations). James B. Appel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francis J. White, Alice M. Holohean, Kathryn A. Cunningham, Patrick M. Callahan, Erik B. Nielsen, Oliver G. Cameron, Linda L. Hernández, Linda Dykstra, Patrick Callahan and Daniel X. Freedman. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, European Journal of Pharmacology, Science and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact