James A. Schellenberg

33 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

James A. Schellenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Safety Research 34
  • General Psychology 5
  • Social Psychology 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 126
Replace Joann Horai with:
Joann Horai United States
John Rijsman Netherlands
Catherine M. Ruvolo United States
Jan Bruins Netherlands
H. J. N. Horsburgh United Kingdom
Martin Irle Germany
Russell Clark United States
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands
Kenneth K. Sereno United States
Jeanne N. Knutson United States
James A. Schellenberg relative to Joann Horai United States Joann Horai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Joann Horai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James A. Schellenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Schellenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Schellenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Schellenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Schellenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Schellenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Schellenberg. The network helps show where James A. Schellenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside James A. Schellenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James A. Schellenberg Line = papers co-authored together James A. Schellenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The science of conflict
198229
2 197129
3 196024
4 196422
5 198519
6 197318
7 197318
8 195918
9 199711
10 196511
11 197710
12
Masters of social psychology : Freud, Mead, Lewin, and Skinner
19789
13 19866
14 19905
15 19574
16 19884
17 19914
18 19653
19 19913
20 19942

About James A. Schellenberg

James A. Schellenberg is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 37 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Game Theory and Applications (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers) and Irish and British Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Safety Research (34 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), Social Psychology (71 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (126 citations). James A. Schellenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elliot Aronson, Daniel Druckman, James L. Russell, Kenneth J. Gergen and Fred Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Conflict Resolution, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review, The Journal of Social Psychology and Review of Religious Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact