James A. Compton

616 citations
38 papers · 452 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James A. Compton

31 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

James A. Compton
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 219
  • Plant Science 192
  • Toxicology 16
  • Molecular Biology 276
  • Cell Biology 41
Replace Caixiang Xie with:
Caixiang Xie China
Jorge Paiva Portugal
Gaetano Bissoli Spain
Jennifer M. Edmonds United Kingdom
Asuka Kuwabara Japan
Anne Lise Schutte South Africa
Svetlana Bancheva Bulgaria
Shasha Wu China
Dawn E. Hall Canada
Robert Allkinꝉ United Kingdom
James A. Compton relative to Caixiang Xie China Caixiang Xie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Caixiang Xie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James A. Compton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Compton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Compton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Compton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Compton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Compton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Compton. The network helps show where James A. Compton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James A. Compton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James A. Compton Line = papers co-authored together James A. Compton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998102
2 200070
3 199854
4 202139
5 201926
6 200623
7 200421
8 199719
9
Effect of Fish Size on Prey Size Selection in Gambusia Affinis
198014
10 201312
11 201211
12 200910
13
Eucomis L'Heritier.
19909
14 20136
15 20154
16 20124
17 20213
18
Additional remarks on Ranunculaceae in Taiwan (4) The genus Cimicifuga L. ex Wernisch.
19953
19 20153
20 20202

About James A. Compton

James A. Compton is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Genetics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (16 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (6 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (4 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers) and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (219 citations), Plant Science (192 citations), Toxicology (16 citations), Molecular Biology (276 citations) and Cell Biology (41 citations). James A. Compton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Alastair Culham, Stephen L. Jury, J. George Gibbings, Mary Gibby, Freek T. Bakker, Terry A. Hedderson, Brian Schrire, Junxing Yang, Hans Walter Lack and Hang Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Taxon, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Systematic Botany, Molecular Biology and Evolution and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact