Jaime Williams

51 papers receiving 972 citations

Peers

Jaime Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 172
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • General Health Professions 206
  • Clinical Psychology 175
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 104
Replace Wolfgang Söllner with:
Wolfgang Söllner Germany
Caroline Swarbrick United Kingdom
Unaiza Niaz United States
Shijun Zhu United States
Sarah Goldberg United Kingdom
Alexandra L. Terrill United States
Marike E. de Boer Netherlands
Satoru Tsuneto Japan
Peter Elsass Denmark
Christine Toye Australia
Jaime Williams relative to Wolfgang Söllner Germany Wolfgang Söllner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Wolfgang Söllner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime Williams. The network helps show where Jaime Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime Williams Line = papers co-authored together Jaime Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005111
2
A qualitative investigation of seniors' and caregivers' views on pain assessment and management.
200576
3 201362
4 200956
5 200843
6 201538
7 201036
8 201636
9 201436
10 201335
11 201330
12 200530
13 201529
14 201328
15 197128
16 201626
17 201324
18 201722
19 201721
20 201319

About Jaime Williams

Jaime Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (172 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), General Health Professions (206 citations), Clinical Psychology (175 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations). Jaime Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Donald Sharpe, Ronald R. Martin, David Cruise Malloy, Carolyn M. Tucker, Heather D. Hadjistavropoulos, Sharon Kaasalainen, Paulette V. Hunter, Sarah Chan and Michelle M. Gagnon. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Research and Management, Pain Medicine, Disability and Rehabilitation, Ageing and Society and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact