Jade Forster

869 citations
13 papers · 324 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jade Forster

13 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Jade Forster
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Genetics 220
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 173
  • Immunology 93
  • Hematology 29
  • Cancer Research 25
Replace Noelia Purroy with:
Noelia Purroy Spain
Yuanxue Huang United Kingdom
Martin Brejcha Czechia
Panagiotis Baliakas Sweden
Yoshitomo Maesako Japan
Veronika Navrkalová Czechia
Anja Führer Germany
Vladimíra Vranová Czechia
Elsa Maître France
Kaushali A. Patel United States
Jade Forster relative to Noelia Purroy Spain Noelia Purroy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Noelia Purroy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jade Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jade Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jade Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade Forster. The network helps show where Jade Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jade Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jade Forster Line = papers co-authored together Jade Forster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2012151
2 201353
3 201446
4 201623
5 201117
6 201313
7 201910
8
Absence of mutations in the 6th exon of Fc epsilon RI-beta.
19964
9 20122
10
The contribution of gene mutations to long-term clinical outcomes: data from the randomised UK LRF CLL4 trial
20172
11
A clinical trial of a new treatment for bovine ringworm.
19571
12 20081
13 20111

About Jade Forster

Jade Forster is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (5 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (2 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (220 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (173 citations), Immunology (93 citations), Hematology (29 citations) and Cancer Research (25 citations). Jade Forster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan C. Strefford, Andrew Collins, David Oscier, Matthew Rose‐Zerilli, Helen Parker, Anne Gardiner, Daniel Catovsky, Anton Parker, Nicholas C.P. Cross and Monica Else. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Experimental Hematology, Leukemia, PLoS ONE and Ecology and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact