Jade Forster
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Genetics 5
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 5
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research 1
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 5
- Co-authors
- Jonathan C. Strefford (6 shared papers)Helen Parker (6 shared papers)David Oscier (7 shared papers)Andrew Collins (5 shared papers)Matthew Rose‐Zerilli (5 shared papers)Anne Gardiner (3 shared papers)Daniel Catovsky (4 shared papers)Anton Parker (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Blood (3 papers)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Veterinary Record (1 paper)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Leukemia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainGermany
In The Last Decade
Jade Forster
13 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Genetics 223
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 185
- Immunology 107
- Hematology 29
- Cancer Research 35
Countries citing papers authored by Jade Forster
This map shows the geographic impact of Jade Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade Forster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jade Forster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade Forster. The network helps show where Jade Forster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jade Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | Absence of mutations in the 6th exon of Fc epsilon RI-beta. | 1996 | 4 |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | The contribution of gene mutations to long-term clinical outcomes: data from the randomised UK LRF CLL4 trial | 2017 | 2 |
| 11 | A clinical trial of a new treatment for bovine ringworm. | 1957 | 1 |
| 12 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 1 |
About Jade Forster
Jade Forster is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Cancer Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (5 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (3 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (2 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (223 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (185 citations), Immunology (107 citations), Hematology (29 citations) and Cancer Research (35 citations). Jade Forster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan C. Strefford, Helen Parker, David Oscier, Andrew Collins, Matthew Rose‐Zerilli, Anne Gardiner, Daniel Catovsky, Anton Parker, Nils Winkelmann and David González de Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, British Journal of Cancer, Veterinary Record, Ecology and Evolution and Leukemia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.