Jade Dignam

2.6k citations
18 papers · 330 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jade Dignam

13 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Jade Dignam
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Rehabilitation 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 249
  • Neurology 22
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 36
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 37
Replace Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman with:
Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman Netherlands
John E. Pierce Australia
Hanane El Hachioui Netherlands
Narges Radman Switzerland
Sigfus Kristinsson United States
Jaime B. Lee United States
Sarah M. Schneck United States
Sophia van Hees Australia
Anna Farrell Australia
Abby Foster Australia
Jade Dignam relative to Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman Netherlands Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jade Dignam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jade Dignam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade Dignam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade Dignam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jade Dignam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade Dignam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade Dignam. The network helps show where Jade Dignam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jade Dignam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jade Dignam Line = papers co-authored together Jade Dignam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201879
2 201579
3 201752
4 201544
5 201532
6 202410
7
Intensive versus distributed aphasia therapy: A non-randomised, parallel-groups, dosage-controlled study
20157
8 20247
9 20237
10 20235
11 20224
12 20132
13
Investigating the role of intensity in a comprehensive, aphasia therapy program: A non-intensive trial of Aphasia LIFT
20142
14 20250
15 20250
16 20250
17 20230
18 20250

About Jade Dignam

Jade Dignam is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (15 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (249 citations), Neurology (22 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations). Jade Dignam has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David A. Copland, Amy D. Rodriguez, Kate O’Brien, Alexander Leff, Anna Farrell, Asaduzzaman Khan, Clare L. Burns, Anne J. Hill, Elizabeth C. Ward and Linda Worrall. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Neuropsychologia, PM&R and Stroke.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact