Jacob E. Ricker

16 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Jacob E. Ricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 220
  • Spectroscopy 143
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 128
  • Biomedical Engineering 133
  • Mechanical Engineering 59
Replace Gregory E. Scace with:
Gregory E. Scace United States
Gregory F. Strouse United States
Jintao Zhang China
Cécile Guianvarc'H France
Thorsten Zandt Germany
Andrew Wallard United Kingdom
J. O. Wilhelm Germany
P. J. Kortbeek Netherlands
J. V. Widiatmo Japan
Cornelia Küchenmeister Germany
Jacob E. Ricker relative to Gregory E. Scace United States Gregory E. Scace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Gregory E. Scace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob E. Ricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob E. Ricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob E. Ricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob E. Ricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob E. Ricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob E. Ricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob E. Ricker. The network helps show where Jacob E. Ricker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacob E. Ricker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacob E. Ricker Line = papers co-authored together Jacob E. Ricker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201786
2 201564
3 201661
4 201729
5 201826
6 201616
7 201615
8 20219
9 20136
10 20184
11 20214
12
MEASURING PRESSURE AND VACUUM WITH LIGHT: A NEW PHOTONIC, QUANTUM-BASED, PRESSURE STANDARD | NIST
20153
13 20183
14 20163
15 20142
16 20181
17
Towards Photonics Enabled Quantum Metrology of Temperature, Pressure and Vacuum
20160
18 20250

About Jacob E. Ricker

Jacob E. Ricker is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (14 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (9 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (3 papers), Laser Design and Applications (3 papers) and Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (220 citations), Spectroscopy (143 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (128 citations), Biomedical Engineering (133 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (59 citations). Jacob E. Ricker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jay H. Hendricks, Patrick Egan, Jack A. Stone, Gregory F. Strouse, Gregory E. Scace, Julia Scherschligt, Daniel S. Barker, James A. Fedchak, Stephen Eckel and Douglas A. Olson. Their work appears in journals such as Metrologia, Optics Letters, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Measurement and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact