Jack de Groot
Impact in
-
- Organ Donation and Transplantation
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Oceanography top 10%
- Marine and coastal plant biology
- Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Papers in
-
- Organ Donation and Transplantation 4
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
- Co-authors
- Wim Smeets (4 shared papers)Myrra Vernooij‐Dassen (4 shared papers)Evert van Leeuwen (4 shared papers)Andries J. Hoitsma (4 shared papers)Cornelia Hoedemaekers (4 shared papers)Hans Schilderman (1 shared paper)Carlo Leget (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Medical Ethics (2 papers)BMC Anesthesiology (1 paper)Transplantation (1 paper)Aquatic Botany (1 paper)Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Jack de Groot
7 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 184
- Oceanography 82
- Transplantation 11
- Clinical Psychology 69
- Aquatic Science 24
Countries citing papers authored by Jack de Groot
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack de Groot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack de Groot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack de Groot. The network helps show where Jack de Groot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jack de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 2 |
About Jack de Groot
Jack de Groot is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper) and Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (184 citations), Oceanography (82 citations), Transplantation (11 citations), Clinical Psychology (69 citations) and Aquatic Science (24 citations). Jack de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wim Smeets, Myrra Vernooij‐Dassen, Evert van Leeuwen, Andries J. Hoitsma, Cornelia Hoedemaekers, Hans Schilderman and Carlo Leget. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, BMC Anesthesiology, Transplantation, Aquatic Botany and Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.