Hans Schilderman
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 15
- Religion, Society, and Development 9
- Theological Perspectives and Practices 4
- Health 14
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 14
- Co-authors
- Peer Scheepers (7 shared papers)H.J.M. Venbrux (6 shared papers)Michael Scherer‐Rath (7 shared papers)Renske Kruizinga (4 shared papers)Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven (4 shared papers)Ben Pelzer (4 shared papers)Christina M. Puchalski (2 shared papers)Jack de Groot (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Empirical Theology (11 papers)Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging (3 papers)Mortality (2 papers)Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (2 papers)Supportive Care in Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Hans Schilderman
36 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Health 120
- Clinical Psychology 74
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Religious studies 18
- Conservation 10
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Schilderman
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Schilderman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Schilderman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Schilderman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Schilderman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Schilderman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Schilderman. The network helps show where Hans Schilderman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Hans Schilderman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 3 |
About Hans Schilderman
Hans Schilderman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Education, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (15 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (14 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (9 papers), Religious Education and Schools (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Theological Perspectives and Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (120 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations), Sociology and Political Science (164 citations), Religious studies (18 citations) and Conservation (10 citations). Hans Schilderman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peer Scheepers, H.J.M. Venbrux, Michael Scherer‐Rath, Renske Kruizinga, Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven, Ben Pelzer, Christina M. Puchalski, Jack de Groot, Evert van Leeuwen and Andries J. Hoitsma. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Empirical Theology, Journal of Religion Spirituality & Aging, Mortality, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Supportive Care in Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.