Jack Amar

652 citations
23 papers · 505 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Papers in

Jack Amar

23 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Jack Amar
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Gastroenterology 70
  • Oncology 162
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 129
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Surgery 136
Replace Shinichiro Yada with:
Shinichiro Yada Japan
Hirotsugu Tomoda Japan
Kai Bickenbach United States
T. T. Wu United States
P. Sundelin Sweden
Xian-rui Wu United States
Akihiro Okano Japan
Tammy Naab United States
Rintaro Moroi Japan
Chang‐Ho Jeon South Korea
Jack Amar relative to Shinichiro Yada Japan Shinichiro Yada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Shinichiro Yada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Amar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Amar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Amar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Amar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Amar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Amar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Amar. The network helps show where Jack Amar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Amar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Amar Line = papers co-authored together Jack Amar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198684
2 201472
3 198472
4 200844
5 201044
6 200233
7 201428
8 200423
9 199621
10 201116
11 201815
12 201110
13 20018
14 20078
15 20195
16 20024
17 20054
18 20024
19 20173
20 20193

About Jack Amar

Jack Amar is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers), Microscopic Colitis (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (70 citations), Oncology (162 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (129 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations) and Surgery (136 citations). Jack Amar has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Hazel Cheng, Matthew Bjerknes, Robert Enns, Eric Lam, Jennifer J. Telford, Geoffrey W. Gardiner, Brian Bressler, Fergal Donnellan, Hin Hin Ko and Michael F. Byrne. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gastroenterology, World Journal of Gastroenterology, The Anatomical Record and Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact