J. van Ek

1.1k citations
52 papers · 891 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. van Ek

50 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

J. van Ek
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Condensed Matter Physics 205
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 525
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 250
  • Materials Chemistry 361
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 50
Replace H. Homma with:
H. Homma United States
P. R. Bressler Germany
A. Biedermann Austria
A. W. Webb United States
P. Käckell Germany
V. S. Stepanyuk Germany
U. G. Volkmann Chile
J. Kołaczkiewicz Poland
J. Guo United States
Willem Jan Huisman Netherlands
J. van Ek relative to H. Homma United States H. Homma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
H. Homma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. van Ek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. van Ek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. van Ek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. van Ek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. van Ek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. van Ek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. van Ek. The network helps show where J. van Ek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. van Ek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. van Ek Line = papers co-authored together J. van Ek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199770
2 199951
3 199650
4 199849
5 199748
6 199346
7 199744
8 199739
9 199337
10 199836
11 199532
12 199628
13 199925
14 199124
15 200922
16 199622
17 200718
18 199817
19 199117
20 200217

About J. van Ek

J. van Ek is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 52 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (21 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (12 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (12 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (11 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (9 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (8 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (7 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (205 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (525 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (250 citations), Materials Chemistry (361 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (50 citations). J. van Ek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Lodder, J.P. Dekker, P. E. A. Turchi, J. M. MacLaren, Ulrike Diebold, A. Gonis, P. A. Sterne, T. C. Schulthess, M. L. Plumer and X.-G. Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact