J. Rees

39 papers receiving 789 citations

Peers

J. Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 85
  • Hardware and Architecture 133
  • Software 42
  • Transplantation 22
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 134
Replace Bent Bruun Kristensen with:
Bent Bruun Kristensen Denmark
Thomas Hallgren Sweden
William McCune United States
William B. Silverman United States
Michael Homer New Zealand
Keith Seymour United Kingdom
Diana Quinlan Canada
Peter Barth United States
Masahiko Sakai Japan
Óscar Garnica Spain
J. Rees relative to Bent Bruun Kristensen Denmark Bent Bruun Kristensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Bent Bruun Kristensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Rees. The network helps show where J. Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Rees Line = papers co-authored together J. Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986341
2 2000106
3 199852
4 201043
5 199839
6 199831
7 200626
8 199126
9
Screening for hyperlipidaemia in childhood. Recommendations of the British Hyperlipidaemia Association.
199622
10 199621
11 199719
12 199716
13 200115
14 198213
15 200711
16 201711
17 198810
18 19909
19 20038
20 19858

About J. Rees

J. Rees is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (2 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (85 citations), Hardware and Architecture (133 citations), Software (42 citations), Transplantation (22 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (134 citations). J. Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include William Clinger, Adrian Sugar, Thomas Oliver, S.C. Hodder, Lynn Williams, K. Lyons, Rosemary A. Barnes, Richard J. Seymour, D.C. Lloyd and Susan A. Jebb. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine Communications, Clinical Radiology, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bone Marrow Transplantation and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact