J. Peter Forney

12 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

J. Peter Forney
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 165
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
  • Urology 25
  • Rheumatology 53
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
Replace Fatih Şendağ with:
Fatih Şendağ Türkiye
Shlomo Shimonovitz Israel
Devrim Ertunç Türkiye
Pasquale Mastrantonio Italy
Kim Toftager‐Larsen Denmark
Antonios Kontoravdis Greece
Fausta Beneventi Italy
Irwin J. Kerber United States
J. Ricardo Loret de Mola United States
Adam Magos United Kingdom
J. Peter Forney relative to Fatih Şendağ Türkiye Fatih Şendağ's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fatih Şendağ · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Peter Forney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Peter Forney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Peter Forney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Peter Forney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Peter Forney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Peter Forney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Peter Forney. The network helps show where J. Peter Forney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside J. Peter Forney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Peter Forney Line = papers co-authored together J. Peter Forney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1981125
2 1980125
3
Endodermal sinus tumor: a report of two sustained remissions treated postoperatively with a combination of actinomycin D, 5-fluorouracil, and cyclophosphamide.
197549
4 198342
5 198735
6
Sonographic findings and clinical correlations in molar pregnancy.
198034
7
Pregnancy following removal and chemotherapy of ovarian endodermal sinus tumor.
197833
8
Covert bilaterality of mature ovarian teratomas.
197721
9 198315
10 19829
11 19827
12 19861

About J. Peter Forney

J. Peter Forney is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Genetics and Microbiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Actinomycetales infections and treatment (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper), Infectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments (1 paper), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (165 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations), Urology (25 citations), Rheumatology (53 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations). J. Peter Forney has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barry E. Schwarz, Clare D. Edman, Paul C. MacDonald, Morrow Cp, Frank Vellios, David Gal, James Aiman, Rigoberto Santos‐Ramos, Nejib Doss and Fred G. Silva. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact