J. Nath

137 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

J. Nath
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Chemical Health and Safety 44
  • Cancer Research 872
  • Reproductive Medicine 240
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 413
  • Plant Science 620
Replace Francesca Pacchierotti with:
Francesca Pacchierotti Italy
W.M. Generoso United States
Gary A. Sega United States
Jack B. Bishop United States
Francesca Degrassi Italy
A.T. Natarajan Netherlands
Jordi Surrallés Spain
Valerie J. McKelvey‐Martin United Kingdom
R. J. Young United States
William A. Toscano United States
J. Nath relative to Francesca Pacchierotti Italy Francesca Pacchierotti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Francesca Pacchierotti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Nath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Nath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Nath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Nath. The network helps show where J. Nath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Nath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Nath Line = papers co-authored together J. Nath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006132
2 2001129
3 2004113
4 199497
5 199587
6 200475
7 199964
8 199663
9 200063
10
Inhibition of cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C-induced sister chromatid exchanges in mice by vitamin C.
198659
11 199658
12 199851
13 200249
14 199844
15 200041
16 199740
17 199839
18 200537
19 198536
20 198535

About J. Nath

J. Nath is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Plant Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Genetics, having authored 140 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (56 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (22 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (16 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (15 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (8 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (8 papers), Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (8 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (44 citations), Cancer Research (872 citations), Reproductive Medicine (240 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (413 citations) and Plant Science (620 citations). J. Nath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and China. Frequent co-authors include James D. Tucker, T. Ong, John C. Hando, G. Krishna, Andrew J. Wyrobek, Eddie D. Sloter, Kirby L. Johnson, Brenda Eskenazi, Tong-man Ong and Marilyn J. Ramsey. Their work appears in journals such as Cryobiology, Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Biochemical Genetics and Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact