J. Maessen

1.7k citations
26 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

J. Maessen

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

J. Maessen
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Surgery 783
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 333
  • Oncology 96
  • Physiology 87
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 6
Replace Rachel Owen with:
Rachel Owen United States
Anna Gu United States
Greta L. Krapohl United States
Adil A. Shah United States
Claire Hunter United States
Tyler S. Wahl United States
Shantanu Rout United Kingdom
Howard Julien United States
Tahania Ahmad United Kingdom
Rena C. Moon United States
J. Maessen relative to Rachel Owen United States Rachel Owen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Rachel Owen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Maessen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Maessen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Maessen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Maessen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Maessen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Maessen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Maessen. The network helps show where J. Maessen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Maessen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Maessen Line = papers co-authored together J. Maessen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007374
2 2015122
3 2013105
4 200898
5 201569
6 201459
7 201452
8 201448
9 201743
10 200829
11 201720
12
Salt-sensitivity testing in patients with borderline hypertension: reproducibility and potential mechanisms.
199520
13 200819
14 202215
15 201515
16 201212
17 202010
18 20207
19 20157
20 20146

About J. Maessen

J. Maessen is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (12 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper), Sodium Intake and Health (1 paper) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (783 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (333 citations), Oncology (96 citations), Physiology (87 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (6 citations). J. Maessen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include M.F. von Meyenfeldt, Trudy van der Weijden, Carmen D. Dirksen, Stephanie M C Ament, Freek Gillissen, C.H.C. Dejong, Jos Kleijnen, A.G.H. Kessels, Jonas Nygren and Kristoffer Lassen. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Nutrition, BMC Health Services Research, World Journal of Surgery, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact