J. Krämer

26 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

J. Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 493
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
  • Media Technology 62
  • Instrumentation 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
Replace David San Segundo Bello with:
David San Segundo Bello Belgium
Danny Scheffer Belgium
M. Schwarz Germany
Hayato Wakabayashi Japan
Sabrina E. Kemeny United States
S.G. Chamberlain Canada
G. Kreider Netherlands
I. Debusschere Belgium
A. Mortara Switzerland
S. Mendis United States
J. Krämer relative to David San Segundo Bello Belgium David San Segundo Bello's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
David San Segundo Bello · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Krämer. The network helps show where J. Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Krämer Line = papers co-authored together J. Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199388
2 199667
3 200243
4 199641
5 199233
6 200533
7 199631
8 200330
9 199629
10 199328
11 200328
12 200126
13 200224
14 200320
15 199319
16 199814
17 20028
18 19965
19 20025
20 19924

About J. Krämer

J. Krämer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology, Aerospace Engineering and Instrumentation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (20 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (7 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (6 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (5 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (493 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (135 citations), Media Technology (62 citations), Instrumentation (23 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations). J. Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Giacomo Indiveri, Christof Koch, Peter Seitz, H. Baltes, Rahul Sarpeshkar, H. Auderset, E. F. Steigmeier, B. Delley, Tobi Delbrück and P. Lichtsteiner. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors and Actuators A Physical, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, IEEE Micro, Review of Scientific Instruments and IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact