J. Jiménez

24 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

J. Jiménez
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 167
  • Parasitology 62
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 196
  • Mathematical Physics 57
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 75
Replace Mehar Chand with:
Mehar Chand India
Attaullah Attaullah Pakistan
Majid Erfanian Iran
Hossein Kheiri Iran
Raghib Abu-Saris United Arab Emirates
Maria Deijfen Sweden
Xiaohua Ding China
José C. Valverde Spain
Yuzhen Bai China
Alexander Matthews Australia
J. Jiménez relative to Mehar Chand India Mehar Chand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.5×
Mehar Chand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Jiménez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Jiménez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Jiménez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Jiménez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Jiménez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Jiménez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Jiménez. The network helps show where J. Jiménez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Jiménez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Jiménez Line = papers co-authored together J. Jiménez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999160
2 199859
3 199245
4 200232
5 200221
6 199619
7 200016
8 201514
9 201113
10 200211
11 20198
12 20048
13 20177
14 19997
15 20046
16 20195
17 20055
18 20015
19 20175
20 19924

About J. Jiménez

J. Jiménez is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Genetics and Parasitology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chaos control and synchronization (6 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (4 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (3 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (3 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (3 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (167 citations), Parasitology (62 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (196 citations), Mathematical Physics (57 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (75 citations). J. Jiménez has collaborated with scholars based in Venezuela, Colombia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pedro García, E. Álvarez, Alberto Fernández, Giovanni Ruggeri, J. A. Moreno, Neil R. Lynch, Antonio Parravano, M. G. Cosenza, Rafael Rojas and Isabel Hagel. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), PLoS Pathogens, Physical Review Letters and Zebrafish.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact