This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zebrafish. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zebrafish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zebrafish more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Zebrafish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zebrafish.
About Zebrafish
The 946 papers published in Zebrafish in the last decades have received a total of 19.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Zebrafish usually cover Cell Biology (445 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (225 papers), Physiology (75 papers), Aquatic Science (92 papers) and Molecular Biology (364 papers) specifically the topics of Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (431 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (154 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (91 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (88 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (84 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (76 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (72 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zebrafish are Stephen C. Ekker, Karl J. Clark, Leonard I. Zon, David M. Parichy, Larissa B. Patterson, Rui F. Oliveira, Andrew M. Petzold, Irina V. Zhdanova, Lisa A. Schimmenti and Michael Lardelli.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.