J. How

23 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

J. How
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 177
  • Materials Chemistry 243
  • Software 7
  • Aerospace Engineering 33
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 12
Replace Shibu Clement with:
Shibu Clement United Kingdom
Patrick Bunting United Kingdom
Y. Buravand France
G. Manduchi Italy
A. Abdou United States
Ahmad M. Ibrahim United States
Tobias Hartmann Germany
A. Kirjasuo United Kingdom
Shoji Kawasaki Japan
M. Stead United Kingdom
J. How relative to Shibu Clement United Kingdom Shibu Clement's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Shibu Clement · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. How

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. How's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. How with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. How more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. How

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. How. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. How. The network helps show where J. How may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. How, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. How Line = papers co-authored together J. How links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999149
2 199982
3 200723
4 199220
5 199920
6 199215
7 198612
8 200011
9 200311
10 199210
11 200210
12 20039
13 19978
14 19866
15 19964
16 20053
17 19952
18 19952
19 20022
20 20062

About J. How

J. How is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Materials Chemistry and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (19 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (9 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (6 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (1 paper), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (1 paper) and Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (177 citations), Materials Chemistry (243 citations), Software (7 citations), Aerospace Engineering (33 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (12 citations). J. How has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Guillerminet, P. Barabaschi, S. Chiocchio, Gabriella Saibene, Filippo Sartori, P. Andrew, Alan T. Peacock, David Kinna, O.N. Hemming and Paul McCullen. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vacuum, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact