J. Fairlamb

602 citations
9 papers · 340 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Astro and Planetary Science
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Astronomy and Astrophysical Research

Papers in

    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 7
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 6
    • Astro and Planetary Science 5
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1
    • Planetary Science and Exploration 1
    • Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure 2

J. Fairlamb

8 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

J. Fairlamb
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 335
  • Instrumentation 20
  • Spectroscopy 86
  • Atmospheric Science 20
  • Geophysics 8
Replace Søren Frimann with:
Søren Frimann Denmark
Ana Uribe United States
E. Kryukova United States
M. Pomarès France
L. Adame Mexico
T. Yu. Magakian Armenia
Л. В. Тамбовцева Russia
Scott A. Barenfeld United States
Fernando Cruz-Sáenz de Miera Germany
Hideaki Fujiwara Japan
J. Fairlamb relative to Søren Frimann Denmark Søren Frimann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Søren Frimann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Fairlamb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Fairlamb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Fairlamb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Fairlamb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Fairlamb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Fairlamb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Fairlamb. The network helps show where J. Fairlamb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Fairlamb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Fairlamb Line = papers co-authored together J. Fairlamb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2015131
2 202073
3 201438
4 201637
5 201530
6 201522
7 20157
8
Icelandic Threat Perceptions
19812
9 20240

About J. Fairlamb

J. Fairlamb is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Spectroscopy, Political Science and International Relations, Geophysics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (2 papers), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (1 paper), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1 paper), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (1 paper) and Planetary Science and Exploration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (335 citations), Instrumentation (20 citations), Spectroscopy (86 citations), Atmospheric Science (20 citations) and Geophysics (8 citations). J. Fairlamb has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. D. Oudmaijer, I. Mendigutía, John D. Ilee, M. E. van den Ancker, Miguel Vioque, Stefan Kraus, H. E. Wheelwright, Nuria Calvet, S. L. Lumsden and E. Rigliaco. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and Naval War College review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact