J. Escós

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

J. Escós
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 378
  • Small Animals 183
  • Geometry and Topology 195
  • Ecology 412
  • Animal Science and Zoology 147
Replace Luı́s Vicente with:
Luı́s Vicente Portugal
Claudia Palestrini Italy
Ronald E. Masters United States
A. J. Mark Hewison France
January Weiner Poland
Donald E. Spalinger United States
Lyn C. Branch United States
Cyrille Barrette Canada
John P. Haskell United States
Jacqui Codron South Africa
J. Escós relative to Luı́s Vicente Portugal Luı́s Vicente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.9×
Luı́s Vicente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Escós

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Escós's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Escós with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Escós more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Escós

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Escós. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Escós. The network helps show where J. Escós may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Escós, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Escós Line = papers co-authored together J. Escós links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200498
2 199691
3 200485
4 201376
5 200367
6 199555
7 201052
8 200046
9 199744
10 200640
11 199139
12 199938
13 199236
14 199435
15 200135
16 201430
17 199530
18 199526
19 200226
20
Developmental instability as an indicator of natural stress on the Pacific Hake (Merlussius productus)
199425

About J. Escós

J. Escós is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (6 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (378 citations), Small Animals (183 citations), Geometry and Topology (195 citations), Ecology (412 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (147 citations). J. Escós has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Concepción L. Alados, John M. Emlen, G. A. María, Yolanda Pueyo, Teresa Navarro, Baltasar Cabezudo, Fernando G. Barroso, D. Carl Freeman, Morris Villarroel and Genaro C. Miranda‐de la Lama. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Arid Environments, International Journal of Plant Sciences, Ecological Modelling, Applied Animal Behaviour Science and Canadian Journal of Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact