J E Mok

420 citations
27 papers · 342 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

J E Mok

25 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

J E Mok
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Reproductive Medicine 99
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 87
  • Genetics 101
  • Molecular Biology 142
  • Oncology 47
Replace S. Mancuso with:
S. Mancuso Italy
E. Piazzola Italy
Marcin Opławski Poland
M Abrate Italy
Zehra Ordulu United States
S Ozeki Japan
Masato Kita Japan
M. J. Merino United States
Marcia A. Ciccone United States
Elif Peştereli Türkiye
J E Mok relative to S. Mancuso Italy S. Mancuso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
S. Mancuso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J E Mok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J E Mok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J E Mok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J E Mok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J E Mok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J E Mok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J E Mok. The network helps show where J E Mok may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J E Mok, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J E Mok Line = papers co-authored together J E Mok links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Loss of FHIT expression in cervical carcinoma cell lines and primary tumors.
1997126
2 199835
3 200630
4
Lamellar body count in amniotic fluid as a rapid screening test for fetal lung maturity.
199625
5 199619
6 202115
7 202014
8 200213
9 200612
10 200610
11 20217
12 20057
13 20236
14 20024
15 20213
16 19983
17 20242
18 20062
19 20182
20 20032

About J E Mok

J E Mok is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers) and Bone health and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (99 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (87 citations), Genetics (101 citations), Molecular Biology (142 citations) and Oncology (47 citations). J E Mok has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Puerto Rico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Young Tae Kim, K. V. Shah, Denise C. Connolly, Núbia Muñóz, Rong Wu, R.Y. Lei, Kathleen R. Cho, David L. Greenspan, Joshua T Vogelstein and F. Xavier Bosch. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Endocrine Research, Scientific Reports, American Journal of Roentgenology and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact