J. de Wit

22 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

J. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Neurology 160
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • Infectious Diseases 69
Replace Margaret Kay Ho with:
Margaret Kay Ho Hong Kong
Vasiliki Efstathiou Greece
Christos Kouimtsidis United Kingdom
Burç Çağrı Poyraz Türkiye
Marzia Molinaro Italy
Marcia J. Chapman United States
Camila Saggioro de Figueiredo Brazil
Rodolfo Furlan Damiano Brazil
Erika B. Litvin United States
Christopher R. Berghoff United States
J. de Wit relative to Margaret Kay Ho Hong Kong Margaret Kay Ho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Margaret Kay Ho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. de Wit. The network helps show where J. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together J. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013186
2 2017105
3 2013105
4 201245
5 202033
6 201832
7 201927
8 201721
9 201518
10 201914
11 201912
12 200112
13 201810
14 201410
15 20028
16 20137
17 20196
18
Genesee County Land Bank Side Lot Transfer Program Evaluation
20065
19 20214
20
Treatment of Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorders and Depression with Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Motivational Interviewing
20143

About J. de Wit

J. de Wit is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and General Health Professions, having authored 23 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (7 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Family Support in Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (59 citations), Neurology (160 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations) and Infectious Diseases (69 citations). J. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Andersson, Pim Cuijpers, Carin D. Schröder, Heleen Riper, Leonard H. van den Berg, Johanna M. A. Visser‐Meily, Sarah B. Hunter, Matthias Berking, Anita Beelen and Annerieke C. van Groenestijn. Their work appears in journals such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, AIDS Care, BMC Psychology, Sexually Transmitted Infections and British Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact