William Smith
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation 1
- Health 1
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 1
- Journals
- SAGE Open (1 paper)Journal of Special Operations Medicine (1 paper)The Downside Review (1 paper)Princeton University Press eBooks (1 paper)Readex Microprint eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Smith
4 papers receiving 687 citations
William Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Philosophy 380
- History and Philosophy of Science 107
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 136
- Theoretical Computer Science 10
- Anthropology 69
Countries citing papers authored by William Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside William Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 876 |
| 2 | The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation /Edited by Jonathan Barnes. -- | 1984 | 26 |
| 3 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 4 | An exercise consisting of a dialogue and ode sacred to the memory of his late gracious majesty Geogre [sic] II | 1989 | 1 |
| 5 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 6 | The efficiency of scramble crossings | 2010 | 1 |
| 7 | 2022 | 0 |
About William Smith
William Smith is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health, Civil and Structural Engineering, Clinical Psychology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 7 papers that have together received 923 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Hemoglobin structure and function (1 paper), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper), Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (1 paper) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (380 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (107 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (10 citations) and Anthropology (69 citations). William Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ross, Marek S. Kopacz and William J. Barnes. Their work appears in journals such as SAGE Open, Journal of Special Operations Medicine, The Downside Review, Princeton University Press eBooks and Readex Microprint eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.