J. Brüning

528 citations
34 papers · 292 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

J. Brüning

33 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

J. Brüning
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Mathematical Physics 158
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 95
  • Applied Mathematics 75
  • Geometry and Topology 40
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 58
Replace Radu Purice with:
Radu Purice Romania
W. Bulla Austria
Alexander Pushnitski United Kingdom
Richard Lavine United States
Giandomenico Orlandi Italy
Martin Fraas Switzerland
Konstantin Pankrashkin France
Andrea Posilicano Italy
Maria J. Esteban France
Л. П. Нижник Ukraine
J. Brüning relative to Radu Purice Romania Radu Purice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Radu Purice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Brüning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Brüning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Brüning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Brüning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Brüning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Brüning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Brüning. The network helps show where J. Brüning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside J. Brüning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Brüning Line = papers co-authored together J. Brüning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200350
2 199330
3 200629
4 199124
5 200623
6
200613
7 200111
8 200410
9 20129
10 20099
11 20089
12 19998
13 20127
14 20077
15 20136
16 20116
17 20055
18 20085
19 20114
20 20024

About J. Brüning

J. Brüning is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Materials Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (17 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (7 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (5 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (5 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (4 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (158 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (95 citations), Applied Mathematics (75 citations), Geometry and Topology (40 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (58 citations). J. Brüning has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include V. A. Geyler, S. Yu. Dobrokhotov, Xiaonan Ma, Matthias Lesch, R. Seeley, V. V. Grushin, Павел Б. Сорокин, А. И. Шафаревич, Л. А. Чернозатонский and А.А. Федоров. Their work appears in journals such as Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics, Geometric and Functional Analysis, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, Physical Review B and The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact